| Movement and Shelter Options to Reduce Population Vulnerability. |
JAN 1970 |
|
| Authors:
Edgar A. Parsons; SYSTEM SCIENCES INC BETHESDA MD
|
 | The report presents the case for movement and shelter options as an adjunct to CSP. The movement measure is to remove populations from potential blast areas of nuclear bursts. 'Survival Plans' of the last decades are reviewed and various degrees of evacuation are analyzed. The conclusions are that if a 75% evacuation of a population at risk was possible in a crisis period and a PF of 20 could be ... |
|
| Civil Defense Communications. Movement to Shelter Concept: Communications Implications, |
SEP 1968 |
|
| Authors:
Albert J. Mandelbaum; Thomas W. Cook; STANFORD RESEARCH INST MENLO PARK CALIF
|
| The MTS concept visualizes the movement of the central city population to fallout shelters located within a ring on the periphery of the city at distances where the direct effects of a large nuclear weapon detonating in the central city would cause minimal damage to the shelter occupants. The urban population would be relocated to these shelters during periods of high international tension. The labor force, however, would commute from ... |
|
| CONCENTRATION OF POPULATION AND SELECTED ESSENTIAL RESOURCES, |
APR 1968 |
|
| Authors:
Leonard J. Bickley; INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES ALEXANDRIA VA PROGRAM ANALYSIS DIV
|
| This Supplement to IDA Study S-300, County Resource Data for Civil Defense Applications, presents a useful refinement of the data reported therein indicating the relationships of population to selected resources. Study S-300 showed the concentration of population and various resources separately. This supplement relates each of the resources directly to the population concentration. A set of graphs are presented relating the percentages of national totals of selected resources to cumulative ... |
|
| SOME PITFALLS IN THE ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL LOCATIONAL PREFERENCES, |
OCT 1963 |
|
| Authors:
Eugene F. Brigham; RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA
|
| Professor Frieden has provided planners with a valuable tool for analyzing the strenth of a metropolitan population's preference for a central residential location. This is a significant contribution, since important decisions involving millions of dollars must or at least should be based on this preference. In illustrating his methodology, however, Frieden commits two errors: he uses a single, atypical sample to represent an entire area, and he fails to take ... |
|
Reports by Keyword(s)
(POPULATION
