| B-1 Systems Approach to Training. Volume II. Appendix A. Cost Details. |
JUL 1975 |
|
| Authors:
Hans G. Reif; William F. H. Ring; CALSPAN CORP BUFFALO NY
|
 | The purpose of this report is to document the details of the cost analysis for the B-1 Aircrew Training System. Included are the cost data base, which is the raw material from which cost estimates are made, the actual values used to evaluate the recommended, baseline system, and results from the other analyses which were conducted on selected parameters. (Author) |
|
| A Cost Effectiveness Approach for Aircrew Training with Laser Guided Tactical Weapons. |
DEC 1973 |
|
| Authors:
Claude Griffin Kincade; AIR FORCE INST OF TECH WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
|
 | A methodology was developed to help identify optimal aircrew continuation training systems for use in the tactical air forces. The area of training for employment of laser guided weapons was selected to provide a realistic example for cost effectiveness analysis. Data obtained from interviews with fourteen aircrew members with laser combat experience were used to establish estimated aircrew continuation training requirements for five mutually exclusive alternative training methods. The main ... |
|
| Navigator-Observer Utilization Field Flying Specialties Study Appendix II. Common and Non-Common Operational Task Requirements. |
APR 1972 |
|
| Authors:
Clarence A. Semple Jr.; Raymond J. Heapy; Ernest J. Conway; MANNED SYSTEMS SCIENCES INC NORTHRIDGE CA
|
 | This volume presents information developed during Phase II of a three-phase study designed to provide a technical basis for determining future (1975-1990) navigator training requirements. The term navigator is used generically to refer to Navigator (AFSC 1535), Radar Navigator (Navigator-Bombardier) (AFSC 1525), Weapon Systems Officer (AFSC 1555), and Electronic Warfare Officer (AFSC 1575). This appendix addresses the methodology which was developed and used to determine common and non-common operational task ... |
|
| Navigator-Observer Utilization Field Flying Specialties Study Appendix III. Development of Training Requirements. |
APR 1972 |
|
| Authors:
Clarence A. Semple Jr.; Raymond J. Heapy; Ernest J. Conway; MANNED SYSTEMS SCIENCES INC NORTHRIDGE CA
|
 | This volume presents information developed during Phase III of a three-phase study designed to provide a technical basis for determining future (1975-1990) navigator training requirements. The term navigator is used generically to refer to Navigator (AFSC 1535), Radar Navigator (Navigator-Bombardier) (AFSC 1525), Weapon Systems Officer (AFSC 1555), and Electronic Warfare Officer (AFSC 1575). This Appendix addresses the methodology used for developing training Criterion Objectives, along with methodological problems encountered while ... |
|
| AN/FPS-102 System Pilot Training Ranges, |
FEB 1969 |
|
| Authors:
Everett B. Hill; Ronald D. Hise; NAVAL WEAPONS CENTER CHINA LAKE CA
|
 | This report describes in detail the instrumentation necessary for training aircraft pilots in bombing techniques. The essential elements of the system are a modified M-33 radar, two Model 5 optical trackers, two Model 5 flight-profile plotters, six skyscreens, three impact-spotting quadrants, one impact-spotting board, and a timing console. When the training includes dive bombing and conventional-weapons delivery, optical aquisition and radar acquisition systems are added. This equipment measures the aircraft's ... |
|
| EVALUATION REPORT ON THE AIRMAN DEVELOPMENT COURSE, |
23 JUL 1965 |
|
| Authors:
H. H. Valverde; PILOT TRAINING WING (3500TH) REESE AFB TX
|
 | The report pressents an evaluation of the Reese Air Force Base, Texas Airman Development Course which was designed to be a continuation of the airman basic military training conducted at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas. The Airman Development Course was prepared by training personnel at Reese Air Force Base. The purpose of the course was to increase the military efficiency of Airmen in grades E1 and E2. The instructional units ... |
|