| Cooperative Threat Reduction: Contracts Awarded by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency in Support of the Cooperative Threat Reduction Program |
25 AUG 2004 |
38 pages |
| Authors:
Terry L. McKinney; Timothy E. Moore; Robert E. Bender; Steven I. Case; Cheryl L. Snyder; Karen A. Ulatowski; David P. Goodykoontz; Kevin G. Burrowes; Breon E. Dehoux; Theresa L. Tameris; INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPT OF DEFENSE ARLINGTON VA
|
 | Our overall audit objective was to determine whether DTRA contracting processes in support of the CTR Program complied with applicable laws and regulations. Specifically, we determined whether contracts were awarded and managed to ensure the Government received best value in cost and contractor performance. We also reviewed the management control program as it related to the overall audit objective. |
|
| Automation of the DoD Export License Application Review Process |
15 JAN 2002 |
34 pages |
| Authors:
Shelton R. Young; Evelyn R. Klemstine; Timothy E. Moore; Michael J. Guagliano; Jane T. Thomas; INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPT OF DEFENSE ARLINGTON VA
|
| Public Law 106-65, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, section 1402, "Annual Report on Transfers of Militarily Sensitive Technology to Countries and Entities of Concern," October 5, 1999, requires that the Inspectors General of the Departments of Commerce, Defense, Energy, and State, in consultation with the Director, Central Intelligence Agency, and the Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, conduct annual interagency reviews of the transfer of militarily sensitive technologies ... |
|
| Foreign National Security Controls at DoD Research Laboratories |
27 OCT 2000 |
64 pages |
| Authors:
Shelton R. Young; Evelyn R. Klemstine; Timothy E. Moore; Jane T. Thomas; Julie C. Kienitz; INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPT OF DEFENSE ARLINGTON VA
|
| Public Law 106-65, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, section 1402, "Annual Report on Transfer of Militarily Sensitive Technologies to Countries and Entities of Concern," requires an annual interagency review on the transfer of militarily sensitive technologies to countries and entities of concern. We visited the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in Arlington, Virginia; the Army Research Laboratory in Adelphi, Maryland; the Naval Research ... |
|
| Joint Operation Planning Year 2000 Issues |
27 OCT 1999 |
59 pages |
| Authors:
Shelton R. Young; Evelyn R. Klemstine; Timothy E. Moore; Cheryl L. Snyder; Frank J. Kelly; INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPT OF DEFENSE ARLINGTON VA
|
| The overall objective was to evaluate whether DoD adequately planned for and managed Y2K risks to avoid problems in planning and executing mobilization, deployment, employment, and sustainment activities associated with military operations. Specifically, we evaluated whether DoD assessed the mission criticality and Y2K compliance of the operational planning information systems and developed end-to-end tests and contingency plans for those systems. |
|
| Hotline Allegations Concerning a Request for Proposal for the Defense Message System |
26 JAN 1995 |
43 pages |
| Authors:
Thomas F. Gimble; Mary L. Ugone; Haskell I. Lynn; Timothy E. Moore; Nancy C. Cipolla; INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPT OF DEFENSE ARLINGTON VA
|
| The objective of the audit was to determine the validity of allegations made to the Defense Hotline related to the request for proposal for the DMS. Specifically, the allegations relate to three categories: the cost of DMS was understated, the required multilevel security environment was not defined, and future requirements were not identified in the request for proposal. ... |
|
Reports by Author
