Storming Media: Pentagon Reports and DocumentsPentagon Reports: Fast. Definitive. Complete.     
New Account »
Forgot Password?
Advanced Search »
ManagementPersonnel Management and Labor Relations

Life Cycle Cost/Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of U.S. Army Recruits: High Quality Versus Low Quality

Authors: David M. Funk; NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA
Abstract:
This study is conducted to identify tne relationship between a U.S. Army recruit's quality level and his or her life cycle cost (LCC). We develop a LCC spreadsheet model which considers critical costs accrued by an accessed population over a four year life cycle. Actual attrition data for a sample of the year groups under study is built into the model. LCCs of different percentage mixes of high and low quality are compared to find the least cost force mix. Additionally, we conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis by considering hands-on performance test results to determine the effects of performance on the cost to support a high and low quality soldier per man-year, respectively. Finally, we determine the marginal LCC (MLCC) of both high and low quality soldiers and compare these results. We discover through the use of performance factors that high quality recruits are more cost-effective in terms of their MLCC over the course of a first term enlistment. (AN)

Limitations: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Description: Master's thesis
Pages: 86
Report Date: DEC 94
Report Number: A917292
Keywords relating to this report:
*ARMY PERSONNEL
*LIFE CYCLE COSTS
*RECRUITING
ACTIVE DUTY
APTITUDE TESTS
ARMY TRAINING
ATTRITION
COMPARISON
CORRELATION
COST EFFECTIVENESS
COST MODELS
JOB SATISFACTION
MANPOWER
PERFORMANCE_HUMAN_
PERSONNEL RETENTION
QUALIFICATIONS
RECRUITS
SKILLS
THESES
Email This Abstract