Storming Media: Pentagon Reports and DocumentsPentagon Reports: Fast. Definitive. Complete.     
New Account »
Forgot Password?
Advanced Search »
Military SciencesMilitary Forces and Organizations

Global Challenges and Regional Responses Organizing for the Future

Authors: Michael E. Mathes; ARMY COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF COLL FORT LEAVENWORTH KS SCHOOL OF ADVANCED MILITARY STUDIES
Abstract:
The advent of globalization and the revolution in military affairs necessitates making substantive changes to the Army's organizational structure. The current traditional hierarchical structure worked well in the Cold War era but is now a source of rising tension between warfighting effectiveness and peace keeping efficiencies. Acknowledging the impact of globalization on the Army, Army Chief of Staff General Eric K. Shinseki stated his willingness to tackle tough organizational change. This monograph researches organizational change from the perspective of international corporations responding to the forces of globalization. By studying corporate organizational structure and corporate organizational change, numerous lessons can be drawn that are applicable to the Army's transformation efforts. An analysis of General Motors demonstrates the need for large, traditionally structured organizations to embrace change while the study of Shell Oil demonstrates the necessity of sustaining structural change. Given the difficulty and the importance of the organizational redesign process, it is critical that the Army's leadership studies past efforts to reorganize the Army and researches corporate case studies focusing on organizational transformation. Many of the concerns that General Shinseki is facing in his attempt to organize the Army into a strategically responsive force are identical to the ones faced by chief executive officers in the corporate arena. A failure to study corporate America's reorganization efforts increases the risk that the Army's transformation efforts will fail, leaving the Army isolated and operationally and strategically irrelevant in comparison with its forward looking sister services.

Limitations: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Description: Monograph rept.
Pages: 67
Report Date: 2000
Report Number: A561283
Keywords relating to this report:
*ARMY
*CORPORATIONS
*GLOBAL
*ORGANIZATIONS
CASE STUDIES
COLD WAR
COMBAT EFFECTIVENESS
EFFICIENCY
EXECUTIVES
INTERNATIONAL
LEADERSHIP
MODIFICATION
OFFICER PERSONNEL
PEACEKEEPING
RESPONSE
STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES
WARFARE
Email This Abstract