Abstract: This thesis examines the changes that have taken place in doctrinal aviation training manuals, aviation regulations, and career development guidelines for commissioned aviation officers. The intent is to determine how Aviation Branch, through the evolution of these key publications, has affected the skill development of commissioned officers. Additionally, this thesis compares current aviation tables of organization and equipment to past "H" series tables of organization and equipment organizations as well as current tables for the other combat arms branches. This comparison is to determine whether or not current force structures cause aviation officers to spend significantly more time in staff rather than line positions compared to their predecessors and their combat arms peers. This study concludes that the capstone aviation regulations, training manuals, and career development guidelines have, over time, gradually de-emphasized the development of flight skills for the commissioned officer. Additionally, the study concludes that aviation officers have less, and in some cases, much less opportunity to serve in line positions than did their predecessors and current combat arms peers because today's aviation force structures have disproportionate staff to line officer ratios.
| Limitations: |
 APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE |
| Description: |
Master's thesis |
| Pages: |
123 |
| Report Date: |
02 JUN 2000 |
| Report Number: |
A339283 |
|
|
|
|
Keywords relating to this report:
